worldcat
SEARCH IN OUR CATALOG

RESPONSIBLE USE OF METRICS

Bibliometric indicators are quantitative metrics that allow the quality and impact of scientific results to be assessed.

 

To ensure a responsible use, it is essential to contextualize the indicators used, consider their limitations and complement them with other types of evidence. Indicators should be use to justify qualitative judgement on research assessment and no metric or combination of metrics should be used as a substitute for expert peer review in research performance assessment.

 

All metrics have weaknesses and biases. Not taking biases into account means that any interpretation or analysis will always be incomplete and can lead to lead to unwise decisions.

 

For more information on the responsible use of metrics and good practice in research evaluation, please visit the following websites:

ARTICLE & BOOK LEVEL METRICS

These are indicators that measure the quality of a particular article. Standardized metrics should always be preferred, as they allow comparison of different articles. 

JOURNAL LEVEL METRICS

Journal-level indicators are used to measure the impact, relevance and quality of a particular publication through the number of citations received, among other things. This indicator allows different journals to be compared with each other. 

 

It is important to note that journal-level metrics can never be used as a unique evidence, as they do not demonstrate the quality of a scientific publication. They should always be used in conjunction with other metrics.

AUTHOR LEVEL METRICS

Personal metrics measure the impact of an individual researcher using quantitative metrics based on citations.  

 

The h-index expresses the number of articles (h) that have received at least h citations. The h-index is influenced both by quantity (Scholarly Output) and publication impact (Citation Count). Some databases have their own h-index, such as Scopus, Web of Science or Google Scholar.

 

It is important to note that for this index to be calculated correctly, it is necessary that the researcher’s profile is up to date, see also our information on researcher profiles and standardized signatures.

LIBRARY SUPPORT FOR SEXENIOS

Through the National Commission for the Evaluation of Research Activity (CNEAI), ANECA carries out the evaluation of the research activity of university researchers with the aim of contributing to the promotion of the quality of the Spanish university system within the framework of the criteria and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area and the design of a teaching and research career model for academic researchers.