Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to the ability of computer systems to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as reasoning, learning, problem-solving, and decision-making. By analyzing large amounts of data, AI systems can identify patterns, generate insights, and support predictions or automated decisions.
Generative AI is a branch of artificial intelligence that focuses on creating new content in response to user instructions or prompts. These systems can generate text, images, audio, video, code, and other types of content by learning patterns from large datasets during training. As a result, generative AI tools have the potential to transform content creation, research, education, and many other fields by making the production of information faster and more accessible.
However, generative AI also presents important challenges. Its outputs may contain inaccuracies, reflect biases present in training data, or reproduce copyrighted material without clear attribution. For this reason, AI-generated content should be critically evaluated and used responsibly, particularly in academic, professional, and research contexts.
The following sections summarize some of the main ethical, technical, and societal challenges associated with the use of Artificial Intelligence. Understanding these issues is essential for using AI responsibly in academic, professional, and everyday contexts.
AI tools can be used to support different aspects of the research process:
Since the use of AI has become widespread, its role in academic publishing has been a central point of discussion in scholarly circles. The most relevant topics surrounding those debates have been:
Authorship and Attribution: The use of AI in research and writing has incited the debate of how to assign authorship and attribution, since AI systems have been known to generate portions of academic articles, opening discussions about whether to considerate AI as an author or a tool.
Plagiarism and Originality: AI-generated content may increase the risk of plagiarism if it is used without proper acknowledgment or critical review. Researchers and students should follow institutional guidelines on citation and responsible AI use.
Intellectual Property: Questions remain about the ownership of AI-generated content and the use of copyrighted materials in AI systems. Understanding licensing, copyright, and intellectual property rights is essential when using AI in academic work.
Quality and Reliability: AI-generated outputs should be carefully reviewed for accuracy, originality, and relevance. Human oversight remains essential to ensure the quality of academic research and publications.
Ethics and Transparency: Responsible AI use requires transparency about how AI has contributed to research, writing, or content creation. Users should also be aware of potential biases, inaccuracies, and ethical implications associated with AI-generated content.
In February 2025, IE University entered into a strategic partnership with OpenAI, becoming one of the first universities worldwide to do so. As a result, ChatGPT Edu has been adopted as the University’s standard AI platform for general use.
To learn more about ChatGPT training opportunities and how to access a complimentary license, please visit the AI Training section.
For faculty members, it is also possible to obtain individual licenses by participating in a co-teaching certificate program or making a request through your platform.
Since April 2026, IE University provides faculty and staff with access to Nebula One, our enterprise AI platform, known internally as IE AI Engine. Designed to support daily academic and administrative activities within a secure environment, the platform offers access to a wide range of leading artificial intelligence models through a single interface.
IE AI Engine enables users to select the model best suited to each task and to create customized AI agents that enhance productivity, streamline workflows, and support a variety of professional and academic use cases. Available models include GPT-5 (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), Gemini (Google), Grok (xAI), Llama (Meta), DeepSeek, and Mistral, among many others. Through its Azure-based infrastructure, the platform provides access to nearly 2,000 AI models.
Faculty can interact with these models through chat-based interfaces, evaluate different responses, and create customized AI agents tailored to teaching, research, and academic support needs. By offering a flexible and innovative AI workspace, NebulaOne enables professors to explore new approaches to integrating artificial intelligence into their academic activities and classroom practice.
You can access the IE AI Engine (NebulaOne) here.
Artificial Intelligence is also embedded within Blackboard, the learning management system used by faculty across IE University.
Blackboard’s AI features support a variety of teaching and learning activities. Faculty can generate and refine rubrics, including assessment criteria and learning outcomes, while maintaining full control over the final content. AI can also assist in creating quizzes, multiple-choice questions, and question banks based on course materials. Additionally, AI Conversations offer customizable, guided interactions that allow students to practice key concepts and receive formative feedback in a secure and instructor-managed environment.
These capabilities are available by default, requiring no additional installation or setup. To help faculty make the most of these tools, the Faculty Training & Support team regularly delivers webinars and training sessions on AI-enhanced teaching practices.
AI tools in Blackboard:
IE University has also developed three different tools designed to support teaching and learning. They can be accessed directly within Blackboard by clicking the “+” icon in any content area and selecting “Content Market.”
Together, all three tools are meant to support the full scope of the teaching experience.
| Tool | Source / How to Use | Information Accuracy | Key Strengths | Limitations | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Copilot | Context-aware responses with improved reasoning. |
|
|
Organizations and professionals heavily invested in Microsoft tools; productivity, documentation, collaboration, and enterprise workflows. | |
| Perplexity |
|
Provides source citations by default, making answers easier to verify. |
|
|
Academic research, source-confirmed search, and deep information discovery. |
| ChatGPT |
|
Broad knowledge base combined with strong reasoning capabilities; maintains continuity across conversations, projects, and uploaded materials. |
|
|
Creative and logical problem solving, document analysis, and project workflows. |
| Claude (Anthropic) |
|
Efficient reasoning with strong continuity across long conversations and projects. |
|
|
Software development, coding tasks, and enterprise AI workflows. |
| Tool | Source / How to Use | Purpose | Key Features | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scite | Uses AI-powered citation analysis to help researchers evaluate how scientific papers have been cited and discussed within the academic literature. |
|
Literature reviews, research finding evaluation, and citation-based analysis. | |
| Elicit | Automates empirical research workflows and literature discovery. |
|
Empirical research, systematic reviews, and accelerating evidence gathering and analysis. | |
| Inciteful |
|
Supports research discovery by revealing citation relationships and identifying influential papers within a research field. |
|
Exploring citation networks, identifying foundational research, and discovering related literature. |
| Research Rabbit |
|
Helps researchers explore academic literature through visual maps and personalized recommendations. |
|
Literature visualization and personalized exploration. |
Prompt engineering is the practice of conceptualizing, defining and perfecting the inputs fed to AI language models in order to achieve the desired outputs required by the user.
It involves designing prompts that steer the model in generating responses that are accurate, relevant, and aligned with the user’s goals.
In an academic setting, mastering prompt engineering allows students and researchers to unlock the full potential of AI in research and development of diverse academic support features and activities.
Further Resources:
Google: Gemini for Google Workspace – Prompting Guide 101
A detailed guide from Google introducing best practices for writing effective prompts. It can be applied to all GenAI tools.
OpenAI: Prompt engineering best practices for ChatGPT
An outline of best practices and prompt engineering instructions for ChatGPT, created by OpenAI. It includes tips on structuring prompts, giving clear instructions, and iterating to improve responses.
OpenAI Related resources from around the web
Lists of prompting libraries & tools, prompting guides, video courses and papers on advanced prompting to improve reasoning compiled by OpenAI.
Quick Reference Guide to Citing AI Tools
Passage in Source
“Nature in Mansfield Park often mirrors the personalities or inner states of the characters. The different environments – Mansfield Park, Sotherton, and the wilderness at the parsonage – are symbolic of the moral choices and the values of the people who inhabit them
Paraphrased in Your Prose
In Mansfield Park, physical locations like Mansfield Park and Sotherton reflect the morality and choices of the people who live in them (“Describe the theme”).
Quoted in Your Prose
Nature is depicted frequently throughout Mansfield Park, and it “often mirrors the personalities or inner states of the characters” (“Describe the theme”).
Works-Cited-List Entry
“Describe the theme of nature in Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park” prompt. ChatGPT, model GPT-4o, OpenAI, 23 Sept. 2024, chatgpt.com/share/66f1b0a0-d704-8000-be9a-85f53c850607.
Footnote example:
Chicago style recommends citing ChatGPT in a Chicago footnote.
Important!
Like AI, citation requirements for AI-generated content are in constant evolution. To ensure your use of AI is correctly disclosed, make sure to check the guidelines provided by your instructor, department, publisher, or journal, as requirements may vary by discipline and institution.
After the increase of the use of AI in the academic process, different publishers have established their own policies regarding permissible use and attribution.
Some of those policies are as follows: